News & Community
 · Welcome!
 · News Archive
 
SOF Web
 · Messageboard
 · Essential Files
SoF 2 Info
 · SoF 2 Walkthrough
 · SoF 2 FAQ
 · SoF 2 Cheats
 · SoF 2 Bulletpoints
 · SoF 2 Cast
 · SoF 2 Gallery
 · SoF 2 Mapping
 · SoF 2 For Xbox
SoF 1 Info
 · SoF Walkthrough
 · SoF FAQ
 · SoF Cheats
 · SoF Quick FAQ
 · Gold & Platinum Editions
 · SoF Articles
 · SoF Weapons
 · SoF Characters
 · SoF Awards
 · Video Card Timings
 · What If?
 · SoF Mailbag
 · SoF Reviews
 · SoF Fansite Links
Affiliates
Official Links
 · Raven-Games
 · Mindless Games
 · Activision
 · id Software
 · Raven Software
 · SoF Magazine
Soldier of Fortune Articles
Page 1 of 1

Editorial by Patrick 'twisted' Hardy


The 21st Century’s Survival of the Fittest?



The mighty stadium rumbles with anticipation as death stirs. Two figures start to battle and they don’t know which one will survive. Each time one of the blades touches the flesh, the crowd goes wild. Blood spews from a body as another remains standing.

A player by the name of Deadpool advances through the dim hallway with his shotgun ready to fire. He hears footsteps from around the corner as he nears. In seconds, a gun fight breaks out with bullets blazing. Deadpool wins, enjoying his simple victory by taking his hand of the mouse and gives his friend a high five.

The two scenes I described above have very much in common. One scene is a typical gladiatorial game in ancient Rome, the other a depiction of an online gamer winning a duel. Though seemingly very different, that may not be the case. Give me your time and I will discuss humans’ darker side, violence.

From the beginning of civilization, survival of the fittest has always existed. However, this theory of all animals, including humans, has changed as society has progressed. Romans, infamous for their gladiatorial combat, exemplify a typical pre-Judeo-Christian culture. They did not have a commandment stating that killing was wrong, thus, why not entertain Roman citizens by pitting slaves, criminals, and beggars in a duel to the death. "Why not?" most of these peoples figured, "No one gives a damn whether they live or not." While this view appears very barbaric to society today, Romans became excited at the thought of making their own kind fight for their life and ultimately prove which gladiator was the best by achieving victory.

Originally, gladiatorial and athletic games were associated with funerals. The purpose of the contest was not to exhibit blood sport, but to glorify man and to unite and solidify society. It’s ironic that the Romans took these contests and debased the funeral celebrations. Instead, emperors held the spectacles to appease the populace and keep them under their control.

Today, thankfully, we do not participate in such cruel and gruesome practices. Although society presently values the sanctity of each human life, there is one subject that many find controversial. Do games such as Soldier of Fortune desensitize our emotions in to not feeling remorse for real life death? I answer a resounding "No!" when asked this question. I believe that games were originally created for fun and to take up time. However, Soldier of Fortune and many other First Person Shooters help me vent my anger on imaginary and meaningless enemies in games. One time or another, we have imagined ourselves as the hero in these games fighting for good and slaying evil. But does my hobby bring out the same horrific and brutish violence in me that occurred during Roman Empire’s gladiatorial games? Many people would agree that yes, this would be the same emotion drawn out. They could look at the situation and say that the main object of the computer game is to stay alive just as it was for gladiators.

This view that video games desensitizes people’s emotions just as gladiatorial fights did the crowd, who watched these real life deathmatches, is ridiculous. I think almost all people can separate fact from fantasy, but not everyone. When I saw the recently released Gladiator, I was enthralled and excited by the depiction of gladiatorial fights. The same thing stands true when I first played Soldier of Fortune. I couldn’t believe how realistic and entertaining it was blowing off another enemy’s limb with a gun. Yet, I always remember that these are simply fantasy scenes of violence in which no actual human life is taken. That is why I find that I can enjoy these forms of entertainment i.e. I am not actually looking at a real life lost on video footage. Sometimes, people get too caught up in fantasy so that they almost forget how horrible you feel when you see scenes of human misery. When I visited the National Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C., I was ashamed of human nature after seeing rooms full of murdered people’s shoes. Hitler and others took Darwin’s theory of "survival of the fittest" to an extreme, radical, and cruel level. That is why I write this article to at least impact that one out of a million person who thinks about actually taking another humans life. Video games and movies sometimes glorify death and killing. Still, never should one associate this idea to real life.



« Back to Index


[Back to the top]
© 1998-2008 Mindless Games & Entertainment. All Rights Reserved.
Soldier of Fortune™ and any associated characters are ® ™ Raven Software &/or Activision, Inc. All Rights Reserved.